<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Visitor Engagement Continued&#8230;. by Eric</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blackbeak.com/2007/10/23/visitor-engagement-continued-by-eric/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blackbeak.com/2007/10/23/visitor-engagement-continued-by-eric/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 14:21:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Captain Blackbeak</title>
		<link>http://www.blackbeak.com/2007/10/23/visitor-engagement-continued-by-eric/comment-page-1/#comment-4392</link>
		<dc:creator>Captain Blackbeak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 16:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackbeak.conversionchronicles.com/2007/10/23/visitor-engagement-continued-by-eric/#comment-4392</guid>
		<description>Hi Ac;

I think this is a fairly new method that comprises all the ways in which engagement can be measured. It&#039;s as I say a pretty comprehensive listing. Eric Peterson uses this but I don&#039;t have an example where I&#039;ve used this specific method to measure engagement. I do have one very good example of how two elements of Eric&#039;s engagement index worked when applied to sessions however. 

Take a look at;
http://www.blackbeak.com/2007/10/05/engagement-is-not-an-excuse-its-a-kpi

This shows how I used a combination of segmentation techniques on sessions which could be Di (duration) and Ii (interaction). We saved our client millions using this method. I agree with Eric that there is no standard measurement for engagement. However I do think his method is quite comprehensive. There isn&#039;t anything I can think of that he has missed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ac;</p>
<p>I think this is a fairly new method that comprises all the ways in which engagement can be measured. It&#8217;s as I say a pretty comprehensive listing. Eric Peterson uses this but I don&#8217;t have an example where I&#8217;ve used this specific method to measure engagement. I do have one very good example of how two elements of Eric&#8217;s engagement index worked when applied to sessions however. </p>
<p>Take a look at;<br />
<a href="http://www.blackbeak.com/2007/10/05/engagement-is-not-an-excuse-its-a-kpi" rel="nofollow">http://www.blackbeak.com/2007/10/05/engagement-is-not-an-excuse-its-a-kpi</a></p>
<p>This shows how I used a combination of segmentation techniques on sessions which could be Di (duration) and Ii (interaction). We saved our client millions using this method. I agree with Eric that there is no standard measurement for engagement. However I do think his method is quite comprehensive. There isn&#8217;t anything I can think of that he has missed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ac</title>
		<link>http://www.blackbeak.com/2007/10/23/visitor-engagement-continued-by-eric/comment-page-1/#comment-4384</link>
		<dc:creator>ac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 12:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackbeak.conversionchronicles.com/2007/10/23/visitor-engagement-continued-by-eric/#comment-4384</guid>
		<description>Hummmmm, interesting, but like most measurements, this engagement index will only be useful if it actually leads to key actions of influences real business decisions. I like the fact that it tries to incorporate a number of key measures, but so many mixed together can kind of water down the end result and render this somewhat useless. I guess if you can track the &quot;impact&quot; of certain campaigns or pricing actions or new product introductions, etc., then maybe this index could be helpful. Otherwise, it could well become another interesting index that just kind of gets replaced by the next one someone comes up with. Any examples of how it has been implemented and influenced real business decisions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hummmmm, interesting, but like most measurements, this engagement index will only be useful if it actually leads to key actions of influences real business decisions. I like the fact that it tries to incorporate a number of key measures, but so many mixed together can kind of water down the end result and render this somewhat useless. I guess if you can track the &#8220;impact&#8221; of certain campaigns or pricing actions or new product introductions, etc., then maybe this index could be helpful. Otherwise, it could well become another interesting index that just kind of gets replaced by the next one someone comes up with. Any examples of how it has been implemented and influenced real business decisions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

