<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Interesting usability research</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blackbeak.com/2007/11/28/interesting-usability-research/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blackbeak.com/2007/11/28/interesting-usability-research/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 14:21:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Captain Blackbeak</title>
		<link>http://www.blackbeak.com/2007/11/28/interesting-usability-research/comment-page-1/#comment-5344</link>
		<dc:creator>Captain Blackbeak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 19:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackbeak.conversionchronicles.com/2007/11/28/interesting-usability-research/#comment-5344</guid>
		<description>The rollover navigation (drop down) was something I expected to see scored lower than it was. What was surprising was the amount of people (75%) who voted in favor of the drop down menu as I recall. 

You may be right about the audience, and certainly I&#039;ve seen poor results in drop downs in analytics tests I&#039;ve done. However the sample size (if it&#039;s a true fiugure) does seem good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The rollover navigation (drop down) was something I expected to see scored lower than it was. What was surprising was the amount of people (75%) who voted in favor of the drop down menu as I recall. </p>
<p>You may be right about the audience, and certainly I&#8217;ve seen poor results in drop downs in analytics tests I&#8217;ve done. However the sample size (if it&#8217;s a true fiugure) does seem good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan Eisenberg</title>
		<link>http://www.blackbeak.com/2007/11/28/interesting-usability-research/comment-page-1/#comment-5337</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Eisenberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 10:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackbeak.conversionchronicles.com/2007/11/28/interesting-usability-research/#comment-5337</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t think you chose the wrong one just because you didn&#039;t vote with the majority. I was going to say something in my post but decided to hold off hoping someone like you ;-) would come to this conclusion as well. Let me guess, one of them was the navigation the roll over versus the two rows? Don&#039;t forget there is always survey bias. Ask yourself who is most likely to have taken this research. Is it designers and technical folk or people like you and me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t think you chose the wrong one just because you didn&#8217;t vote with the majority. I was going to say something in my post but decided to hold off hoping someone like you <img src='http://www.blackbeak.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  would come to this conclusion as well. Let me guess, one of them was the navigation the roll over versus the two rows? Don&#8217;t forget there is always survey bias. Ask yourself who is most likely to have taken this research. Is it designers and technical folk or people like you and me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

