Web Analytics 4, 5 and 6.0?


Don’t you just hate that headline? :) I know I do, but no doubt in 10 years people will be talking about 4, 5 and 6.0 like we talk about 1, 2 and 3.0 now. What I’m talking about is how is web analytics going to evolve. I’d like to draw your attention to this post on Eric Petersons blog. In it an interesting discussion has been taking place which was started by Ian Thomas of Microsoft. In it Ian basically made a couple of bold predictions.

There will be no Web Analytics vendors, but Web Analytics will be everywhere.

and

In five years, all Web Analytics software will be free

Interesting speculation. Ian basically is saying that web analytics will cease to exist in it’s current form and be part of something bigger, something that many of us agree with, Jim Sterne said 2 years ago that in 5 years web analytics will no longer exist forming part of BI or CRM or moving into a marketing competence while the tools themselves become part of a bigger offering.

The free part I frankly disagree about unless Microsoft and Google (the only companies that can currently sustain the usage of the tools for free through the advertising models) actually make analytics systems which are extremely robust – think Visual Site from Omniture (formerly Visual Sciences).

In a panel I was sitting on (I’m the ugly one on the far right) in London Search engine strategies the same discussion came up. It was reported that we all thought that paid vendors had a tough future. That is something I would like to put straight here;

I do NOT think that 3rd party vendors are about to walk the plank. I think they have a great deal of potential.

I agreed with the panel that free tools supported by an advertising model would dominate because free considerably reduces the cost of the tool – you understand that you will always have a cost associated with web analytics because you need good staff to interpret the results. But there is still a massive part for the Omnitures’ and IndexTools’ of the world to play.

However the real point is how could this all happen? Why are bright folks like Ian Thomas making predictions like this? You have to look at who he is working for. Microsoft and Google currently make far more money via advertsing than anyone will ever see, web analytics revenue to them is small fry. Microsoft and Google also know a lot about the way the technology is advancing. Nick Carr wrote a book called The Big Switch which has some very interesting ideas in it about how the Internet might evolve. Nick and Greg Jarboe talk about it here.

Nick argues that just like electricity 100 years ago when companies moved from in house electricity generation to using a network that the same could happen with computing. Companies like Google and Microsoft are currently spending billions on super computing capabilities and it’s feasible that one day these super computers could run all of our software and take away all of our hardware costs. The idea being that one day you simply turn on the supercomputer from whatever access point you like (laptop, mobile phone, even neural interface) and basically can do everything you can do at the office.

This massive shift is not so far from the way it works now. When you open a Google analytics account or buy the Omniture service you are essentially logging into an ASP which is the first step towards this. This gets me back to the original point of this post. I think that we will see BI and larger integration firms (Accenture) moving toward this model. I said in Eric’s post that data integration is the hardest part of web analytics today (at least once you’ve got the basic analytics skills down) and I stand by that.

Imagine if we could simply login to a system that could combine all our marketing data – regardless of it’s source. Doing this in house is incredibly hard and very expensive. Right now you have a number of systems which require considerable IT support and considerable investment in hardware and software – and combining marketing data from one source to another is usually a manual process. If this was a utility you could pay a much smaller fee for all would you pay for it? Of course you would, and this is where I think that Web Analytics 4, 5 and 6.0 might be heading.

To me a lot of the predictions people are making about where web analytics will go is based on what companies in and around the space are doing and that’s fine. But I think it’s the world at large which will shape the future of web analytics not the small group of companies currently competing in a largely unknown space. I say unknown because I know that most businesses are still not aware of web analytic tools today.

I ran a quick benchmark at BlogPulse.com around three terms being discussed all over the world on blogs today over the last couple of months.

trends_bi_webanalytics.gif

To me the fact that twice as many posts in the blogosphere talk about customer relationships and 4-5 times as many talk about business intelligence shows that the world at large doesn’t know as much about web analytics as it does other competences in marketing. Of course we can’t rely on simply this kind of data but I also know that approximately 5000 companies from 250,000 in Finland use a tool they recognize as a web analytics tool. So I’d say we’re still in the early days of adoption.

This is why companies like Omniture and IndexTools might have a bright future because currently with their ASP knowledge they are ahead of the competition in many markets. Opinions?

Information and Links

Join the fray by commenting, tracking what others have to say, or linking to it from your blog.


Other Posts

Archives

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Categories

Finnish blogs of note (In English)

Web Analytics Blogroll


Write a Comment

Take a moment to comment and tell us what you think. Some basic HTML is allowed for formatting.

Reader Comments

Wow! New design!

To be honest I didn’t like the terms “web analytics 2.0″ and “web analytics 3.0″ either.

I’m off to have coffee 2.0 now.

Cheers!

Yes, the old design was very web 1.0. :) The new design is a work in progress. Still some stuff to add to it but it’s getting there and I think it’s easier to get around.

Cool.

Maybe other things will become part of web analytics rather than the other way around? If the web becomes increasingly more important as a channel.

SAP is like the sewers in New York — does anybody really remember how people reasoned when construction began?

This may be an opportunity to start over and be more clever.

I also believe “web analytics” is a term for us geeks. Have a look at this comparison which paints a different picture:
http://img201.imageshack.us/img201/9113/chartforstevehb3.png

Business Intelligence and CRM are terms that have become standard. “Web analytics” is not yet accepted amongst all users.

The internet is by far the most measurable of mediums. This we know. The more consumers use the web as a primary channel to interact with our companies, our brands and each other – the sooner the ‘rest of the world’ will realize that we need more ‘customer analytics’. As of now…is it the web we’re analyzing…or is it consumers? Or both?

To me, that’s the evolution. I see us analyzing the customer experience at several touch points within the client lifecycle.

Right now, we are only really focused on the web experience in as much as it measures intent, task completion, and certain outcome measures. I have been speaking to the task of redefining market research.

Our whole approach at iPerceptions is ‘real people, real experiences, real time’….Voice of customer analytics.

My personal feeling, is traditional research falls somewhat short in that the results are being compromised by distance and proximity to real people in self initiated situations.

Tasking people is ok for usability – but we are big believers in research being conducted with consumers ‘in the comfort of their own brains’. The web has allowed us to speak to ‘real people, in real experiences’. People can now speak for themselves. A truly democratic landscape.

The future of free…?

My gut says the tools will be free – the analysis will not be.

I agree with you – I think web analytics will change as a result of the way the world evolves….not the other way around.

My two cents.

JL

@Steve

You’ve hit an important point here. My comment is from a media company point of view, where someone has to pay the content producers be they journalists or coders coding CMS applications using open-source tools for our users to generate free content.

Jonathan said that web analytics will evolve just as online will evolve and this could not be more true.

The question you are trying to get at here I think is – Will the Internet and it’s tools be free. I suggest reading Don Tapscott’s Wikinomics, about how the Economics in Free works and how it will change businesses. I just heard him speak in a seminar in Orlando and his story is compelling.

The rise of collaborative communities, crowdsouring and more importantly the rise of the next generation of net-savvy youngsters who have been born and bred in YouTube and Facebook will change the economics of the Internet and therefore also the business models of those who give out software for free today. (We of course have to ask ourselves why these companies are giving away their software for free? The answer is not necessarily the same for all vendors.)

But at the same time we as a media company realize that the most important asset we have is the knowledge of what our customers want, do and crave. And selling this knowledge to the advertisers. Web analytics moving into and being combined with BI and CRM has made this all the more powerful.

Web analytics has give us a very powerful tool combined with interactive marketing to know exactly what kind of advertising works for what kind of user groups, even individuals. We can use this information to make advertising more relavant for our users or help our advertisers make their advertisign better. Or we can aggregate all the
behavioural information and make predictions about how people make buying decisions. Because that is in the end what everyone is after – your wallet. And I think this is the reason why some vendors are giving away their software for free.

What does it mean for us as a media company?

We – too – need to collect and analyze behavioural information and reward our users for being active – give them higher social status, offers or some other incetive. We need to identify the people bringing in new users to these networks. There is a lot of potential in prosumers – alpha users that recommend products and service to other users and bring in more users to the network. Here social analytics brings a lot of powerful tools. We need to open up our APIs; Harness mass collaboration, let users create our stories and build business models that does our users no harm (pun intended).

The difficult part here is leadership. When there is a paradigm shift, such as one that is happening here, estalished leaders are often the last ones to be won over, if at all. Be the decision “free” or not-so-free.

Steve: My apologies for being late to this party!

I concur with other commentators, this is a very thought provoking post, thanks.

I wanted to add two thoughts. . . .

I fundamentally believe that for the next x years free and paid will exist in fine harmony in the web analytics space. There is a place for each of them because each of them solves for something unique.

Additionally it is the job of the free to make life tough for the paid by consistently releasing better features and products, and it is the job of the Paid to work hard and show why they deserve to be paid, but consistently releasing better features and products. What’s there not to love! Especially for a Practitioner Evangelist such as myself. :)

I don’t know what the industry will be called in 10 years (or even 3 years), but I am positive both options will be there.

With regards to version numbers, I understand that my esteemed colleagues such as your self and Lars have a dislike for them. I respect that, and this is not the first time we have disagreed. : ) It won’t be the last time (its part of the learning process).

My humble experience is it is tough to get people to change their mindset. Hardest thing to do. So every once in a while you have to fall back on savvy marketing.

Mr. O’riley did that with Web 2.0. We needed that version number to start to think differently. Not for silly things like “oh rich media is web 2.0″, that is silly because technology is not it. It was always there or will always change. Web 2.0 is a fundamental shift of power from companies to customers, from controlled experience to mashups, from the few to the democracy.

To me Web Analytics 2.0 is that type of a mindset shift.

1.0 was clickstream, and to 99% of the people out there clickstream is still web analytics (of course my esteemed colleagues in the blogosphere excluded).

2.0 was my way of saying “look technology is not it, that is a distraction, start thinking of customer experience differently, start thinking of more data sources, go beyond your own site, start to expand your own knowledge, else suffer with no actionable insights“.

Sometimes it takes a version number to move people forward.

But of course “versions” are easily abused, as you’ll see with web 3.0 and 4.0 etc. Or by saying we are going to start tracking mobile and that is now 3.0, that is still clickstream, just a new data source. Not a mindset shift, more like let’s learn how to process logs, again. : )

We have so much in front of us, exciting evolutionary things that will make us look at this comment thread in a few years and smile at how cute it was. We live at a amazing time of transformation.

In the end the winner will not be determined by who is free and who is not, or who has the latest version number. The winner will be determined by the ones who succeed at helping change mindsets and solving fundamental customer problems.

Thanks again for making us think.

-Avinash.

Hi all,

Currently I’m in Chicago doing client work so am a bit tied up but will get back to this on Friday. Thanks all for the excellent comments so far and keep ‘em coming.

I must say though that it was very clever of you to write about web analytics 4, 5 and 6 simply because now you can say you were first. And it should last a few years. :)

Still not convinced about version numbers. Maybe we should just follow Neil Mason’s lead and start to talk about e-business insights. Then we can move to simply business insights.

But what about non-profit organizations and web analytics? Well, you’re always selling something even if it’s just an opinion or information.

Maybe Persuasion Optimization.

:)

I think commercial website analysis will not disappear into oblivion. Yes Google analytics is a great analytic tool and beats out most of the others, free and paid.

But there was a time when a little keyword tool known as overture keyword suggestion tool ruled the keyword research world. It was free and an excellent program. But does it exist in its up to date form today. I think not.

The problem with free services is you cannot count on their permanence

@Avinash

Thanks for the post.

You offer something I hadn’t thought of with Web/Web Analytics 2.0. To me it has always been about the technology which I thought was overhyped. I remember when we released the Chronicles site in November 2002, it was basically blog technology – except we’d programmed it all ourselves. So I wasn’t that impressed when the same technology for the masses became popular a year or so later as “revolutionary and new”. And 2.0.

Looking at the way O’Riley said it, it’s very platform and technology orientated;

From Wikipedia;
“Web 2.0 is the business revolution in the computer industry caused by the move to the Internet as platform, and an attempt to understand the rules for success on that new platform.”

I’ve always agreed with Tim Berners-Lee on that respect, the technology has always been there.

“Some technology experts, notably Tim Berners-Lee, have questioned whether one can use the term in a meaningful way, since many of the technology components of “Web 2.0″ have existed since the early days of the Web”

Your perspective with Web Analytics 2.0 is different;

To me Web Analytics 2.0 is that type of a mindset shift. 1.0 was clickstream, and to 99% of the people out there clickstream is still web analytics (of course my esteemed colleagues in the blogosphere excluded). 2.0 was my way of saying “look technology is not it, that is a distraction, start thinking of customer experience differently, start thinking of more data sources, start to expand your own knowledge else suffer with no actionable insights”. Sometimes it takes a version number to move people forward.

What you are saying is different in that we need to change the thinking from being all quantitative data to more qualitative, voice of customer/prospect approaches. This kind of work along with the quite brilliant stuff that Jim Novo is doing in customer analytics, is in my view the way companies need to go. I’m guilty of not paying enough attention to what you were saying and why you were saying it when you coined the term Web Analytics 2.0.

I’m working on a number of cases where qualitative data is essential to decision making and agree with you on this point. Whether I would call it Web analytics 2.0 is a different story but I don’t disagree with the principle.

@Jonathan
I think what you’re saying reflects the way Avinash describes web analytics 2.0. A mindshift of purely quantitative data to that of combining quantitative and qualitative data. Voice of customer analytics.

@Anders
Thanks for the book tip, I’ll look into it.

Your perspective is very valuable thanks. I think we can agree on the economics of the Internet changing the way the world works and I can see what you’re saying about collaborations being the way forward.

Would you like to comment on whether you think the model would change from free or not because of the way the next generation will develop?

Google and Microsoft seem to think free is the way to go with Analytics, however I can’t see Omniture ever agreeing unless they monetize their model in a different way – as it would be extremely unlikley they would be able to compete with the advertising gorrillas.

@Lars

Hope you enjoyed your coffee! Interesting ideas about the naming of the future industry. It’s interesting that your perspective could be that BI & CRM data could become part of web analytics rather than the other way around. I actually think that is the way it might go because I also feel that we have the potential to start running a vast amount of services we currently do in house via ASP as I mentioned.

@Affiliate Marketing

I don’t think you can compare Google Analytics to Overture’s keyword tool because GA is simply too strategic to too many companies now which would mean cancellation or changing of the service would be very bad PR for Google.